Prostate cancer and us

Women got rights. Women's rights probably should lead to emancipation of some men too. A rising tide ain't supposed to be selective about which boat it drives up. 

I believe if a lady can do a mastectomy based on calculated risk for breast cancer and beauty sleep, men should be afforded the same rights. 

I am no activist, red beret empty beer can or shower cap waiting to be cleansed off retroviral invasion. I am 100% hard core objective and logical being. Misconceptions have to be cleared upfront and to correct for a baseline. 

All men will develop prostate cancer given enough time, irrespective of how sexually active or nutritionally proper their early childhood habits were. A shower is of no use. Ignorance is only bliss for a select few. Preliminary studies seem to suggest too little sex has negative impact though.

Since all married men seem to fall off the wagon, then we should be at the very least agreable to getting fixed, literally and figuratively, once the cancer rears it's head. 

We cannot possibly be that attached to our manhood that castration, even at that advanced an age, stays a misnomer in our bar talk.

Our path is made even easier as surgery is usually not contemplated in the treatment program.

 

It's all in a few injections and poof the little of what's left of your testosterone goes, and with that the very life blood that most prostate adenocarcinomas depend on. 

It's even easier than that traumatic vasectomy that some of us had to undergo after psychotherapy session number five failed. 

 

As men we owe this to our families at the very least. 

Step into that monk or catholic priest wardrobe and stay alive. 

We need no trousers to be identified as men. 

We need guts of Angelina Jollies ilk. 

We need balls of steel not that soft liability dangling in your pants, excuse the pun. 

I recently had to go through a difficult experience of being send to a shrink for laying my soft tissue liabilities up for the chop. Gender confused beings have less resistance to having their manhood excised. 

I could in a way understand the doctor's predicament.

Prophylactic chop without cancer was outside the box for him. It would have been easier had he been a woman. They don't have nothing to personalize. 

 

I have had to do orchidectomies in kids with late presentation of torsion. It is traumatic for the doctor or surgeon. 

It leaves you with a scar that needs continued counselling long after the deed. You feel like a Bill Gates crusader without much choice or benefits, out to disable mankind godly purpose.

This should be different though. 

We need more subjects quieieng up for this, just like mastectomies and abortion. 

We need more doctor volunteers, prepared to be scarred for life. This flag is to safe life. 

Let's follow the women liberals lead and make this sensitive issue breakfast radio topic without leaving no residual nausea.

Biochemistry and physiology are the elements of every mix, then results are assured